Multiple payers, commonality and free-riding in health care: Medicare and private payers.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Managed health care plans and providers in the US and elsewhere sell their services to multiple payers. For example, the three largest groups of purchasers from health plans in the US are employers, Medicaid plans, and Medicare, with the first two accounting for over 90% of the total enrollees. In the case of hospitals, Medicare is the largest buyer, but it alone only accounts for 40% of the total payments. While payers have different objectives and use different contracting practices, the plans and providers set some elements of the quality in common for all payers. In this paper, we study the interactions between a public payer, modeled on Medicare, which sets a price and takes any willing provider, a private payer, which limits providers and pays a price on the basis of quality, and a provider/plan, in the presence of shared elements of quality. The provider compromises in response to divergent incentives from payers. The private sector dilutes Medicare payment initiatives, and may, under some circumstances, repair Medicare payment policy mistakes. If Medicare behaves strategically in the presence of private payers, it can free-ride on the private payer and set its prices too low. Our paper has many testable implications, including a new hypothesis for why Medicare has failed to gain acceptance of health plans in the US.
منابع مشابه
Private accreditation as a substitute for direct government regulation in public health insurance programs: when is it appropriate?
Private accreditation of health care institutions serves crucial quality assurance functions in the American health care system. Since the advent of widespread third-party payment for health care services in the mid-twentieth century, third-party payers have used private accreditation to thereby identify which health care institutions are qualified to provide services for payment to their benef...
متن کاملReimbursement of tumor marker tests.
The diffusion of new technology is significantly affected by coverage and reimbursement decisions. A variety of agencies (public and private) make decisions as to which technologies or treatments will be covered and what the levels of reimbursement will be. Recently, these agencies' coverage decisions have tended to be strongly affected by whether a technology is cost raising or cost reducing. ...
متن کاملPolicy issues related to prospective payment for pediatric hospitalization
Children's hospitals have been excluded from the Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) because of concerns over the applicability of the DRG case-mix system and PPS payment weights to pediatric hospitalization. Nevertheless, DRG-based payment systems are being adopted by State Medicaid agencies and private third-party payers, and the Health Care Financing Administration has been mandated to...
متن کاملPhysician Fee Levels: Medicare Versus Canada
Adjusted for differences in purchasing power and practice expenses, Canadian physician fees are, on average, 59 percent of Medicare fees. The general perception that Medicare fees are low is the result of comparison with U.S. private fees, not to the much lower Canadian fees. In the context of the current U.S. health care system, lowering Medicare fees to Canadian levels could jeopardize access...
متن کاملHow do Medicare Physician Fees Compare With Private Payers?
Under the new fee schedule, Medicare physician fees are 76 percent of private fees. Consistent with the intent of payment reform, Medicare physician fees more closely approximate private fees for visits (93 percent) than for surgery (51 percent) and in rural areas as compared with large metropolitan areas. Variation in private fees across the country is considerably greater than it is for Medic...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of health economics
دوره 21 6 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2002